Free Ground Shipping Over $100

Galvanized Brooder vs Hatching Time Brooder Efficiency Trial

The Center for Small Flock Research conducted a three-week trial comparing a galvanized brooder with the Hatching Time 4-level brooder for raising broiler chicks. This study highlights differences in feed efficiency, labor, and energy use between the two systems.

Results showed that while chicks in the galvanized brooder grew slightly larger, they consumed 70% more feed and wasted more due to billing. In contrast, the Hatching Time brooder offered better feed conversion ratios (FCR), less feed waste, and more efficient labor management thanks to larger feeders and automatic watering.

On energy savings, the galvanized brooder cost 83% more to operate ($16.32 vs. $9.07 for one Hatching Time level). Managing four levels of the Hatching Time system required no more effort than a single galvanized unit, making it both time and cost-efficient.

🛒 Explore our full line of Chick Brooders
📦 Shop Poultry Supplies

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the main difference between the Hatching Time and galvanized brooders?

The galvanized brooder grew slightly larger chicks but used far more feed, energy, and labor. The Hatching Time brooder provided better feed conversion, reduced waste, and was more efficient overall.

How much feed did the Hatching Time brooder save compared to the galvanized brooder?

Chicks in one level of the Hatching Time brooder consumed 17 lbs of feed in three weeks, compared to 28.8 lbs in the galvanized brooder a 70% savings.

Why was the Hatching Time brooder more energy efficient?

Each level uses its own infrared heater with lower power consumption, costing only $9.07 over three weeks versus $16.32 for the galvanized brooder; 83% less expensive to run.

Who would benefit most from using a Hatching Time brooder?

Small farmers, homesteaders, and poultry researchers benefit from its lower feed costs, reduced labor, energy savings, and hygienic design.